|
ms by Michael Magee
reviewed by K. Silem Mohammad
ms, Michael Magee. Spuyten Duyvil, 2003.
Michael Magee has very weak pun control. In his new
book ms, as in his last, Morning Constitutional, almost
every poem is awash with the slosh of his verbal incontinence. (He should
be wearing “Depunds.”) He takes endless pleasure in hunting
the letter, rhyming us to death, committing random and senseless acts
of epizeuxis, and otherwise choking his phonemic chicken all
over the page. In addition to this semiotic superplus, Magee crams every
inch of poem with high and low and middlebrow cultural references, allusions,
and name-droppings: in short space, he invokes Albert Ayler, Ice-T, Wallace
Stevens, Aphra Behn, Adrienne Rich, Richard Rorty, Groucho Marx, the
Civil Rights Movement, and too many other polycontextual themes even
to begin to list here. And somehow, it all coheres, or maybe “co-hears” is
more like it: Magee has both ears to the ground (and the Plastic-Man
image that you have to conjure in order to visualize such a feat is quite
fitting), listening both to the receding hoofbeats of literary history
and the oncoming roar of the runaway atomic train of postmodernity. In “Body
of Thought,” we are given a double disclaimer that eschews both
epiphany and elegy, transcendental breakthrough and sentimental breaking
down:
no
words
worthian
high
resolution on
the
horizon
or
la la
la
la
meant of such….
Although there may in fact be no high Romantic resolution
in sight in this work, and no straightforwardly nostalgic lament either,
Magee locates himself un-squarely in a space commensurate with the Wordsworthian/Emersonian/Whitmanian/Barakan
etc. project of a poetic whose models and goals are public, hyper-egalitarian,
raucously noisy. This work brings the outside in, mixes it up, and spits
it back out again as a potent cocktail of theory-jive, trash-talking,
free-association, and variously corrupted social texts. In doing so,
however, it never leaves out the possibility of “literary” response,
of an ideal reader or community of readers who can both dance to the
mindless funk and perform close readings that tease out a vast archival
network of intertextual traces.
Magee is very much attuned to an aesthetic of stoopid:
these poems are sometimes aggressively ill-wrought, like Bizarro-world
artifacts whose parts determinedly refuse to contribute to anything like
an organic whole or unified vision; instead, they strive for jarring
inarticulacy, exaggeratedly awkward figurations, as in this stanza from “The
Farmer and the Cowman Should Be Friends!”:
My name’s twice when I was what
Wilbur wasn’t. Don’t get me wrong.
Eyeball it and tell me you wouldn’t
Elbow ere Ana wobble’t on a
Cowbell of the jarhead will. The dragon
Fly’s a wallflower to the shit. The shit
Flies like the crow. The crow’s an artifact.
The fundamental constructive principle here is one
of idiot perseveration, a zombified insistence on following chains of
random signifiers down whatever blind trail they happen to blaze—e.g.,
via the soundplay of eyeball/elbow/wobble/cowbell, or the degraded
free-associative gradatio of shit > flies > crow.
Although these poems are not parodies, they share with parody the tactic
of pirating forms from particular modes and skeletalizing them into grotesque
(dys)functional reductions: the modes that Magee targets, moreover, are
just as often contemporary and “experimental” as they are
canonical and “traditional.” The result is that the book
insists on the obsolescence of satire in a world that has normalized
and subsumed the satiric gesture into the habitus of everyday discourse.
It would be misleading to give the impression that
ms is nothing more than one aphasic act of anti-mimicry after another:
as in the hip-hop and funk musical models that Magee so often draws on, stoopid becomes
a potentially liberatory force, an expression of faith in democratic
ideals, however degraded and erased those ideals have become. Like Superman’s
Bizarro-world, the world of ms is stubbornly opposite to the
dominant values of the mainstream, but somehow its exhaustive series
of reversals results in a purity of commitment that constitutes its own
moral integrity and even system of faith. In“ Fragments for John
Parker,” Magee writes:
“ God makes ’em, God takes ’em”
— my dad
a totally
insufficient thing
to say
except
perhaps in
context:
as response
to the body
gone ass-backwards
for no known reason: “it just does that”
the rhetoric of what’s appropriate
a needle or a ray, concrete, prepositionless
Magee’s application of the ancient rule of decorum
to the chronic condition of ass-backwardness from which we all now suffer
results in a perfectly appropriate rhetorical stance, if a sometimes
perversely ironic one. By all conventional standards of sense and taste,
this book ought not to succeed in its goofily errant air raid on the
inarticulate, but “ it just does.” Uncle Mike is in the
house.
© K. Silem Mohammad. All rights reserved.
|